🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a girl who died after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," commented a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the state level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to copy the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.